Contribution of Rawl's promary goods Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words

Contribution of Rawls promary goods - Essay ExampleFor instance, the contribution of the Congress, in creating policies that would captivate the societal justice. The existence of any valet being depends on these goods. The third category is the wealth and income. Rawl argued that the primary goods had slightly relationship with the social welfare. Since human beings derive their triumph from the social welfare, it means that primary goods would contribute to human happiness. In close to government system, policies on economic goods tend to regulate the distribution of the primary goods in relation to satisfying the human rights. An individual does not have a choice when it comes to attending to the needs of basic right. Life traces its root from these rights thus the conditions that influence these rights must be subject to control. Rawl views the primary goods as factors that will influence an individual ability to achieve the desired goals in life. While is it evident that s ome individuals will not exert the same efforts towards social development, it does not mean that authorities should practice unequal distribution of basic rights. Rawl perspective of inequality as an injustice posits that a segment within a nation would find itself unable to meet the basic liberties despite their best efforts (Sen, 197912). ... The existence of any human being depends on these goods. The argument tends to influence the economists view of goods. The distinction between the primary goods and other types of goods tend to borrow the perspectives of Rawl. It means that economic goods in the whiz of Rawl must be either primary or secondary. Since the primary goods are essential as human basic freedom, human beings cannot do without them. In most government system, policies on economic goods tend to influence the distribution of the primary goods in relation to satisfying the human rights. An individual does not have a choice when it comes to attending to the needs of ba sic right. Life traces its root from these rights thus the conditions that influence these rights must be subject to control. Rawl views the primary goods as factors that will influence an individual ability to achieve the desired goals in life. This argument tends to coincide with economists view of primary goods. The essentiality of these goods steers the society to the next level. The right to life is as primary as the basic goods. The focus that an individual may project in the society would depend on the ability to achieve the basic items. Theories closely human needs tend to address the need to satisfy the basic needs as opposed to other needs (Risse, 20093). The primary needs ingrain the lives of every individual as opposed to other needs within the society. Conversely, this behaviour of the primary goods would influence attempts to initiate economic development in the society. For instance, populate tend to work to satisfy the primary needs first before thinking of the ot her needs in the hierarchy of needs. As