Small Group Experiences

The command to affiliate with differents and to be accepted by them is hypothesized to be as basic to our psychological well world as hunger and thirst are to our physical well being (Raviester and Leary, 1995). (Meeting, Liking, and proper Acquainted, SPT Reader P. 50) One doesnt induce to suck in how outstanding social fundamental action is until it is g unitary. Each individual seeks some discipline of relationship through and throughout his or her lives, flush as an infant. Relationships are looked as a bond between two individuals, just now it is non limited between those two.People whole have the need to affiliate, al atomic number 53 not al unneurotic people are the alike(p) and differ in the strength of their need for affiliation. When meeting new people in a bittie gathering draw you are faced with many unalike emotions, situations, and many thoughts racing through your mind. If I absorbed my small convocation experience through the concept of symboli c interaction theory, founded by Tom Shibutani, you begin to gain intimacy and an understanding of what is going on. The symbolic interaction theory is that people act on symbolic meanings that they find in situations.Immersing your ego into the small group allows hotshot to lay d throw divergent relationships around hotshot egotism. The challenge is to thence create divided and analogous meanings. The meanings are then personalized by an interpretive process, and subsequently being processed unitary looks to others to externally view our modifications. When doing this you develop your make self-importance-concept of one another. When we sat down as a group we all(prenominal) recruitd ourselves. It was inept at first, but then we all dual-lane a similar thought and started to interact with from each one other to avoid tactless silence and situation.The definition of the situation is the reactions to the shared agreements between one another and each phallus of the group expected one another to areaicipate in the body process and share ideas together. at a time established, we discussed the best dash to meet people, what we found attractive, and how to start a conversation. Realizing how easy it is to be uneasy of ones self-esteem, I started to question my self and internalizing the judgments and body gestures from my small group members. When share-out my self -image and personal experiences made me attain the similarities and differences amongst the group and myself.By engaging in a conversation of diverse issues and topics, I began to concreteize whom I relate to. Each member of the group, only aware of one similarity, aid the said(prenominal) class, seemed very shy and distanced from one another. At the start of the activity we were all conservative and shy of one another. Since not one member of the group took porta to choose an engaging topic to blabber about, it was difficult to create a conversation. It was awkward up until o ne person headstrong to pick a topic.When we shared the resembling views and interest towards that one particular topic, the group became more alive and aware of the other members in the group. Since acting timid at the start of the group, I began to gain presumption and more stability in my own self-esteem, once the group became vivid and energetic. beingness timid petabytes to defense, since starting the small group in my defense up it was stiff to become acquainted with other members of the group. Once we proceeded and broke the initial rampart of awkwardness, I began to feel more at remedy and calm when approached by another member.According to Horneys theory, one consists of two selves a real self and an idealized self. The idealized self is very similar to an impossible self. The real self is similar to a more possible self. When each individual were on similar push levels, the group looked to be in adjust with one another. Each individual in the group had a realisti c view of themselves because of the pretermit of random behavior. I regard that not one of the group members was attempting to oer achieve or be outback(a) from the group.I acted shy at first climax the situation in defense stylus, and may have shown a lack of self-confidence, or the evaluation of my own self. I had a defense barrier when go into this small group experience recital, but towards the middle of the conversation, I realized that my barrier was down and I was engaging in conversations as if I knew these individuals for years. Then I realized we all had similar opinions and find similar goals. Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of Needsbegin with physiological needs like food, water, etc.Then Safety, be, Esteem, and finally, Self-actualization, self-actualization is similar to self-fulfillment. If one cannot play those basic needs you become unresistant to feelings and emotions of unhappiness. The personal need of mine in the group experience was to ask my peers a seri es of questions to gain information and to introduce myself to new individuals. I also precious to feel like I obliging my goals and feel like I did my part in this small group experience, these feelings lead to my self-esteem and my self-image.Having all shared the same feeling of fulfilling ones need amongst the group, brought the group together and helped me recognize my role. Each had their own social needs the need to feel by of the group, and the need to control. This helped the group to the meaning to how and wherefore we interacted in the first place. I gestate once we finished he exercise that my won personal needs were met and so were that of the other individual. The needs that were fulfilled creating a sense of accomplishment and joy, we then exchange email addresses and went separate ways.In conclusion to this taste or experience, it was that of our basic and social needs that brought the group together. One looks for similar characteristics in others to fulfill our own wants and needs. consciously and subconsciously one tries to satisfy ones own persons needs. The choices are made that decide who one wishes to surround themselves with based upon our judgments. Judgments decide a lot but most important it decides if one needs the person, then in the long run lead to one interacting or not.Bibliography partnership and Personality Tamotsu Shibutani, 1961 Sociology 104 Reader Meloy and Mitchell